In fact, if the President so chose, he could devote his entire State of the Union to criticizing movies he disliked -- without running afoul of the First Amendment. Winds up feeling shallow, padded and unrevealing. language is not acceptable, Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties, We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification, -1) ? The film-maker is made to sit in front of a panel of adjudicators and argue his case, but not refer to any past films as evidence as to why certain cuts should not be made. | The Best Solution: Simply Continue to Let People, Websites, and Groups Offer Their Own Ratings and Evaluations. Interspersed with interviews and a lively presentation of the history of the MPAA, we see clips of the detectives tailing various classifiers as they leave their walled compound in downtown Los Angeles. Plot Keywords
It goes on general release on 1 September, The best in film, music, TV & radio straight to your inbox, Register with your social account or click here to log in. "They had no idea a film was coming in about them," says Dick. The only dissenters in Meese were three famously liberal justices: Blackmun, Brennan, and Marshall. continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates. The title of Kirby Dick’s documentary “This Film Is Not Yet Rated” is not entirely accurate. try again, the name must be unique, You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully, Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful The most insightful comments on all subjects Great insite in the MPAA, FCC and other censorships and rating systems. a head-spinning mystery, a brisk history of motion picture censorship in the U.S. and entertaining, often hilarious, visual proof of Hollywood's hypocrisy in his latest film. the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate.
If anything, the film is rightly educational. Showing all 3 items Jump to: Summaries (2) Synopsis (1) Summaries. Community
That is true even though the resulting stigma would doubtless convince some people not to see the movies he listed (though others would surely hasten to do so). This Film Is Not Yet Rated 2006 F.U.L.L HD 1080 Quality. By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie. "There should be developed standards that are made open to the public and film-makers, and there should a training process, and experts involved in the ratings process. | Rating: 4/5, November 10, 2006 Of the original Court, only Justice Stevens, the author of the Meese majority, remains. He even goes so far as to hire private investigator Becky Altringer to stake out MPAA headquarters and expose Hollywood's best-kept secret. But it's possible the government could get around the problem with disclaimers making clear that the rating was its speech, not the moviemakers, or simply by publicizing its ratings to the public on posters (and through trailers) separate from those advertising the movies. theaters, 9.8 weeks average run per theater. All rights reserved. The reason given is to supposedly avoid "outside influence" on the raters. Microsoft Edge. Along the way, Dick speaks with numerous filmmakers whose careers have been affected by the seemingly random and sexual-content obsessed judgments of the MPAA, including John Waters, Mary Harron, Darren Aronofsky, Kevin Smith, Matt Stone, and Atom Egoyan. |, April 20, 2009 they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. It's still not up to the level of the pre-Christmas boom, or even the yearly average, but at least it's not a desolate wasteland either. He has a point. As he notes, "If you go out un-rated then you have many of the same limitations that an NC-17 has." The only other film to top $10,000 was Mutual Appreciation with $13,142 in its lone theatre. There is another aspect of the MPAA system that is less-discussed, but also a major problem: No one knows who the raters are or whether they have any qualification to do what they do.
(Only the identity of the ratings board's chairperson is known.) Create a commenting name to join the debate. Business is starting to pick up again for DVD releases. Enter your email to follow new comments on this article.
Again no cameras were present to capture the meeting, but the film reveals what little give-and-take there is in the system. Guidelines. ", A Government Film Ratings System: Why, Surprisingly, It Might Be Constitutional.
(In contrast, if each of the 50 states were to embark upon setting up its own labeling, the result would be such a headache for all concerned, even the MPAA's system might look good in comparison.). try again, the name must be unique, Please Matt Stone ("South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut," "Team America: World Police") testifies from experience that studio pictures are treated a lot more kindly than independently financed and distributed ones. (I say this based on photos in the documentary of the members with their opposite-sex spouses, and based on information in the documentary that many are married, in an era where gay marriage is still exceptionally rare.) In addition, the MPAA system often fails to take context into account. Roger Ebert was the film critic of the Chicago Sun-Times from 1967 until his death in 2013. Regal Dick claims this is no revenge mission. Although the MPAA ratings were allegedly created as a way of heading off government censorship, some say that has always been a ruse -- and, besides, a government system would actually require rules, documentation, transparency, accountability and due process. The film premiered at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival and was granted a limited theatrical release on September 1, 2006.
Just confirm how you got your ticket. | There were a couple releases that were contenders for DVD Pick of the Week, but in the end I went with This Film is Not Yet Rated - Buy from Amazon, but since I work in the industry, at least tangentially, my enjoyment of the movie may have been increased somewhat. I sometimes had the same feeling watching "This Film Is Not Yet Rated.". This Film Is Not Yet Rated is a 2006 American documentary film about the Motion Picture Association of America 's rating system and its effect on American culture, directed by Kirby Dick and produced by Eddie Schmidt. It makes a good case for some all-American free enterprise to come up with an alternative. In addition, the majority opinion described the labels at issue as merely providing "additional disclosures that would better enable the public to evaluate the import of the propaganda. The 1987 case that upheld a government movie ratings system was Meese v. Keene, and the Court's split was 5-3 (with Justice Scalia taking no part in the case). Industry insiders would thus be barred, rather than composing what appears to be virtually the entire appeals board. But then Dick would argue he's fighting against an entirely unregulated body that answers to nobody. Compelled by the staggering amount of power that the MPAA ratings board wields, the filmmaker seeks out the true identities of the anonymous elite who control what films make it to the multiplex. Directed by Kirby Dick. Coming Soon. Don't have an account? You can tell that Dick, whose previous documentary Derrida showed that he had serious chops, is having fun with this one. The film's highlight - one that sadly could not be caught on camera - is the moment Dick submits his (unfinished) film to the MPAA. Former MPAA head Jack Valenti said the raters are chosen to represent the views of the "average parent" - and are all parents themselves. Compare this to our own British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), which makes no attempt to keep its employees secret. Firefox, or Coming Soon. And although the MPAA ratings are supposedly "voluntary," agreements between the studios that fund the organization, the exhibitors who show their films, and the media in which those films are advertised, make it something less than optional for most films. Full financial estimates for this film, including domestic and international box office, video sales, video rentals, TV and ancillary revenue Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email. "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" is a catalog of grievances against the MPAA: The membership of the ratings board is anonymous, so the filmmakers have no right to appeal directly to the people who are judging their work. Shockingly, many of those exposed are key figures in Hollywood - from Steve Gilula, chief executive of Fox Searchlight, to John Lodigian, vice president of sales at Sony Pictures - indicating just how in-bed the MPAA is with the studios. The only word I can think to describe it is unfair. | Rating: 2/4 Unsurprisingly, he was turned down. The percentage of Approved Tomatometer Critics who have given this movie a positive review. This Film is Not Yet Rated shows just how much a particular rating can affect the box office performance of your film, and beyond that, how accessible your film will be to the general public. Analysis Of Kirby Dick's This Film Not Yet Rated; Analysis Of Kirby Dick's This Film Not Yet Rated. In a rare and refreshing reversal of roles, filmmakers put the powerful Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA for short) under the microscope for inspection in Academy Award-nominated director Kirby Dick's incisive look at stateside cinema's most notorious non-censoring censors.
But other than this, the raters' identities are secret. Kimberly Peirce ("Boys Don't Cry") and Wayne Kramer and Maria Bello ("The Cooler"), intuit that the raters are uncomfortable with depictions of female sexual pleasure, while Allison Anders ("Grace Of My Heart") suggests that orgasms of any kind are frowned upon (although women's do tend to last longer, and may therefore make the raters more uncomfortable), and that the male body is even more verboten that the female body.
Is Garbus correct that even government labeling would be better than the MPAA's system? 'active' : ''">
It's unclear, but possible. I'll first discuss this precedent here, and in a later section, discuss the ramifications of this case for the idea that replacing the MPAA rating system with a government rating system might actually be an improvement. | Rating: B+ For more information, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Noting down car number plates and even following them to their chosen lunch spots, the spooks eventually collate enough information to unveil "the class of 2005", an on-screen dossier revealing names, ages and photos of all but one of the classifiers. Private lists of "family-friendly" films are very easy to find as it is, and unlike MPAA ratings, these lists often provide a specific analysis of why a film might, or might not, be inappropriate for children of particular ages. Coming Soon, Regal This is "This Film is Not Yet Rated - Trailer" by Kirby Dick on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.